Content marketing may get a lot of buzz these days - but it's as old as advertising itself.
In part two of my conversation with longtime New York Times advertising columnist Stuart Elliott, we continue to talk about how social media has paradoxically fueled growth in television viewership - especially for events like the Super Bowl.
But as part of this wide-ranging farewell Q&A with Elliott - who retired in December after nearly 25 years of covering advertising for the Times - we get into sponsorship advertising, as well as so-called content and video marketing.
Surprise: None of this is future-forward at all. Indeed, it's a return to the golden age of advertising. But while it sideswipes the problem of ad-skipping technologies and an ever-expanding universe of digital distractions, it comes with some considerable challenges of its own.
Click Here to Download: Q&A WITH STUART ELLIOTT: WHAT I SAW AT THE REVOLUTION (PT 2) - THE RISE (& RISKS) OF CONTENT MARKETING
Fox is a very self-aware company about the trouble the network TV business is in. First, the network reacted to Cablevision taking them off the air in a carriage fee dispute by blocking Cablevision ISP subscribers from Hulu, showing that they understand that the network is unnecessary if you want to watch Glee. Now Jim Gianopulos, the chairman of the 20th Century Fox movie studio is scolding cinemas for annoying customers by cluttering the pre-show screen with ads when the audience is used to being able to skip ads with their DVR.
The irony is that theater owners are doing the thing that TV networks used to be able to do quite well: monetize a captive audience. Mr. Gianopulos told the truth -- people don't like having their attention hijacked. Just because they are captive doesn't mean they will accept being hawked at.
The NY Times article that reported this implies that Mr. Gianopulos issued this statement as a partial explanation for the 20% Q1 decline in theatrical revenue. If people are so upset about ads screaming at them that they will avoid seeing a first run movie in its exclusive theatrical run, what does that say... Read more