Tagged 'ftc'

What should we ask FTC Chair Jon Leibowitz at ad:tech NY?

Posted by Brad Berens on October 5th, 2011 at 4:43 pm

Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz is arguably the most powerful person in our industry.  I'm thrilled that he'll be joining us onstage for "ad:tech inspire" at the Javits Center in New York on November 8th. Mr. Leibowitz will give a short presentation and then sit down with a panel of industry experts, but I want to crowd source at least a FEW of the topics we'll kick around-- I'll also be interviewing him here at iMedia Connection.
The other ad:tech inspire panelists are Dave Morgan of Simulmedia, Grace Liau of Vivaki and Scott Meyer of Evidon.
We're working on the session description now and I'll share it soon, but in the meantime please respond in comments with the questions you think we should ask.
And learn more about ad:tech New York here.

“Just” – Is Just The Word You Need To Know About 'Do Not Track'

Posted by Rob Rose on December 14th, 2010 at 11:02 pm

So, I think it’s no secret that for Web projects, technical teams and marketing teams tend to have an inherent distrust for one another.  And, as a guy who works in bridging the technical and marketing teams across these types of projects, I have a few rules that I like to set out between the teams.
For the technical teams, at least in the initial concept meetings, the geeks are not allowed to say “why it won’t”.  They can pitch how to solve a challenge, or they can pitch a new solution (e.g. an enhancement) to an existing problem.  In short, they’re not allowed to poke holes and point out why ideas “won’t work”.  That’s for later.
For the marketing teams, they have an opposite rule.  They have to live by the same rules, of course, but in addition they’re not allowed to use the word “just” to open up any idea.  In other words, they’re not allowed to say “just build a Web site feature that makes Unicorns come out of the screen...”
So, here comes the FTC with it's privacy proposal and the "Do Not Track" issue is becoming hot and heavy. And both technologists and marketers are already talking about how it won't work, and... Read more

FTC's "Hot News Doctrine" is Not So Hot

Posted by Tom Gerace on September 13th, 2010 at 1:57 pm

In recent weeks, there has been buzz surrounding a staff discussion draft published by the FTC on the state of news media. In the report, the FTC states that the intent of this discussion was, in part, to gain information for “potential policy recommendations to address the issues raised during this proceeding” which centered on the revenue model of the news media industry, how the internet has changed the profitability of news media and changes that might be made to help struggling media outlets to become more profitable.
The document introduces the concept of a “hot news doctrine”, which in essence is an extension of the Copyright Act that would “provide express statutory federal protection of short duration and limited scope to the facts reported in news articles.” The net/net of it is that the hot news doctrine would suggest that when a story breaks, the facts in the story be considered copyrighted for a specified amount of time. In essence, it would set a time stamp on exclusivity for breaking news, so that the media property that breaks a news story would be the only property that could share ANY information on this news story for a... Read more

Privacy Education

Posted by Jeff Hirsch on November 30th, 2009 at 12:00 am

As the FTC and IAB iterate over consumer privacy legislation, and the industry concern continues to swell, we are recognizing that the basis of the issue lies in general misperceptions and lack of consumer education around targeted advertising. As an industry we have acknowledged this fact, yet educating consumers and industry outsiders remains a challenge. AudienceScience, along with many other companies, are collaborating with the NAI on consumer outreach. It's no small task and it's easy to understand why many companies just don't know where to start, how best to communicate the message, or how to distribute the message to the consumers we aim to protect. 
It is a critical time in our industry and responsible companies must take action.  First and foremost, companies must examine the resources they have available to communicate and educate. If you have research at your disposal, use it in your message. If you have graphics and creative, leverage it to create something both compelling and easy to understand. I'll say it again because it bears repeating. Make it easy to understand. Consider your audience and don't use jargon or reference stats that are not mainstream measurements.  If it looks like Sanskrit and needs translation, your... Read more

The FTC & Bloggers: It's About Time

Posted by Daniel Flamberg on October 13th, 2009 at 12:00 am

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) revisited its Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising , the rules on truth in advertising, for the first time since 1980  and applied it to bloggers. A firestorm of criticism erupted. 

But I don't get it on several levels. 

For years people pretending to be consumers have been posting blog comments, reviews, criticisms, endorsements, features, benefits, images, schematics  and other content pretending to independent advocates of  brands and causes. Whole firms of these fakeroo posters peddle this service to brands desperate for buzz and new customers. A few years ago Wal*Mart's PR agency, Edelman, got busted for this kind of false-flag abuse.
Bloggers, me included, are always looking for freebies and swag. I'm still jealous that when Jeff Jarvis said he was in "Dell hell" he got a laptop. When I posted my "Dell hell" story I got a snotty call from a Dell flack. 

Over the years, I got a few books to review, a few t-shirts and a mountain of white papers and reports that the authors' often charge for. I haven't shilled for anybody and I've tried to be equally critical of everyone; sometimes ranting and sometimes praising. My goal is to disclose... Read more