Scott Rosenberg’s Wordyard post should be read in full (http://www.wordyard.com/2010/09/02/in-defense-of-links-part-three-in-links-we-trust/), but this excerpt bears repeating verbatim:
“Given the overwhelming power of links, Writing on the Web without linking is like making a movie without cutting. Sure, it can be done; there might even be a few situations where it makes sense. But most of the time, it’s just head-scratchingly self-limiting. To choose not to link is to abandon the medium’s most powerful tool — the thing that makes the Web a web.”
Links are what make the web a web. Simple, powerful, true.
Isn’t it strange, then, that while links are arguably the defining attribute of the web and the basis for the monetization of Search, Social Media has largely eschewed Links in favor of unproven metrics such as Sentiment, Friends, Followers, and Social Impressions. As far as Marketing is concerned, the early years of Social Media can be described simply as a fruitless quest for organizing principles and – a currency.
Perhaps by embracing an attribute that has the benefits of:
- Established commercial value
- Ease of scalable measurement
- Powerful Marketing Relevance (when consumers share a link, they send Marketers a signal)
…Marketers and Social Networks might finally solve the Monetization challenge posed by... Read more