There are a lot of discussions going on about how to create loyalty in a world where the next best offer is a click away. Should we change the cadence or targeting or content of our emails? How can we add badges? Do we need a redesign?
Then, towards the end of the year, it hit me. I fell just a few flights short of getting status on United. So what was the point of taking all those flights on United? Giving one brand my loyalty throughout the year ended like a reverse jackpot. It’s incredibly disappointing and de-motivating to come up empty on recognition for that level of investment.
This all-or-none loyalty framework certainly isn’t unique to United. Many loyalty programs demand you save up points for long periods before they give you any token of preference or thanks. Until then it’s a steady parade of confirmation and survey emails, the latter again asking for me to fill out a form in the hope of winning a ton of points.
So why are loyalty programs turning more people off than on?
Archive for Michael Leis 
Globally Local
Two recurring themes I've seen lately that have me thinking Macluhan:
Big Web brands are accelerating targeting, and now content creation that is hyper-local. From location-based services to ad buys, everyone wants to help you know what's happening right around you.
Brands really want to find ways to make every experience more "personally relevant."
What's resulting is large-scale messages that focus on what's similar, most familiar, and/or closest to you. I love creating consensus as much as the next guy. And concepts like the Big Sort indicate we're wanting that: moving into ideologically homogeneous neighborhoods, safe in our sameness.
But think about the really big trends, especially in very responsive programmatic content channels