Emerging PlatformsSubscribe to Emerging Platforms

Motrin: a tale of two narratives

3 comments, Latest by Adam Kmiec

If you haven't heard, Motrin has deeply insulted the mommy-blogging community this weekend in a row over the following video:



It's a truly unfortunate case of an agency picking out the wrong part of the narrative to broadcast. In the entire backstory of the relationship between mothers and their babies, Motrin and their agency chose to depict the one aspect of the relationship -- holding your baby in a sling -- that is simply the opposite of painful. As many moms tweeted, these are often times the rarer moments of complete comfort and closeness.


There are many times during the post-partum experience that Motrin is relied upon by moms (and dads). Lots of those moments are too personal to put in an ad, but make up the backstory, the subtext of what would create an effective ad. The problem is, no one wants to see this subtext thrown in their face as context. No one wants to be told by a company that the way they hold their baby is a painful fashion trend: regardless of whether it's true. And nobody -- repeat -- nobody wants the disembodied voice of a brand speaking on their behalf. "It makes me look like an official mom" may go down as one of the most insulting single lines of script ever to be spoken.


Here, it just seems as though no one even bothered to search Google or Twitter or ask anyone who has been a mom or a dad what those moments are; As though it was created in a meeting where everyone thought it was such a fantastic idea that no one wanted to validate it against actual experience: all the approvals were already lined up. Even though the ad had been running for slightly more than a month, when this weekend rolled around, Motrin's messaging came at a time when many people were reconciling the real pain of the financial realities of this holiday season.


Motrin serves as narrative vehicle for the abrupt realities of a downsized Christmas


It is often said that Moms, among many other responsibilities in the household and the greater society, are the CFO. So I wondered how our economic climate may have played a role in this rampant tweet-looting of the Motrin digital brand presence.


It bears out many ideas I've had about Twitter as narrative form. Searching terms like layoffs, economy, and retail only showed scant reactions to news stories, if any at all. Yet it is a huge concern of most all Americans. In fact, with the awful retail numbers of last week, retailers are ramping up efforts to get shoppers out, making this the first weekend that families have to deal with the reality that this Christmas will be fundamentally different.


In years past, November was a big month for refinancing as families borrowed their way to big-ticket yuletides. This year, and this past weekend in particular, families are facing two very difficult truths: 1) this Christmas will be on a tight budget and 2) The outlook is bleak, financially for many families in almost every sector of the economy.


So I charted the Twitter activity of a few terms at  Twist to see if anything interesting took shape: Motrin and Motrin moms (the tag used to mark tweets about the subject), Shopping, and Starbucks.


I used Shopping and Starbucks as bellwethers to frame the economy, thinking that if people didn't have the money to shop (therefore tweeting about shopping) that they'd be stopping by small-average-purchase places like Starbucks:



You'll see that on Friday, shopping had almost as many tweets as the peak of  "Motrin" when it ran hot. What's more, when shopping goes down, the day ends, and Motrin skyrockets. To me it is certainly possible that the target audience comes home with a bad case of shoppers’ remorse, looking hard at what the economy is doing to their Christmas budget, and then sitting down to their computers to vent.


The problem is that as people are sitting at their computers decompressing, trying to figure out how Christmas is going to work this year, it is difficult to express their frustrations without saying it straight out in the Twitter stream. They want to find a way to convey these feelings in a narrative that doesn't say, "This Christmas is going to suck. We have less credit, less cash, and only a few more bi-weekly paychecks to make this work."


So as they sit and think about how to express these difficult truths, Motrin is right there at that moment with an ad that is patronizing and out-of-touch. After years of being told to "Live Richly" this was a weekend of facing hard decisions and realities for affluent families. Being told you need a pain reliever for the products that bring your baby closer to you was just the kerosene in the bottle.


Whether you agree or disagree with me or Motrin or Taxi or moms, as digital marketers, it's important to look at factors outside the brand mentions. Especially in a dynamic platform like Twitter, the tools exist for you to dig beyond the mentions of a brand to understand the larger trends of perceptions and patterns audiences display in their social networking usage. And please, before you go into that creative pitch meeting, check out search.twitter.com.


You got down this far, what do you think? Let me know by posting a comment here, or @mleis.

Return to the top.

RELEVANT POSTS

3 Comments Subscribe to this discussion

Russ Unger's headshot

Nov 18, 2008 at 10:20 AM EST

By Russ Unger

Do you really think Motrin is out of touch? I mean, honestly, who puts out anything like that without doing some research? Not only that, take a look at some of the louder voices in the twitterverse yelping about this--and look at their blogs and see if they have any ads hawking things like, you know, slings. Motrin didn't get the pain aspect wrong. Motrin irritated a few moms--many of whom claim they don't even use the product. So, they raised awareness. Then, they pulled an ad and said "We hear you". Then, the rallying of the #motrinmoms ended because... Because... Oh yeah, they had no true leadership. So they got what they wanted and this story is dead faster than the 15minutes of an American Idol cast-off. I mean, who started it? Who was it that found an ad that is 1.5 months old? If anything, the #motrinmoms run the risk of being the "Moms who cried wolf", because this wasn't a big, huge deal in the grand scheme of things. Motrin can easily repair, if they haven't done so already. They're a brand that ticked off 7-10% (est) of the interweb users, of which roughly 80% (not factual, based on a comment from my blog) admitted that they don't use the product. What's the big win? For that matter, what was the big lose? This is a big opportunity for Motrin--they've got press, and what they do with it next needs to be positive and swift. The MotrinMoms are pretty much done already--and they've got no real leadership behind them; that ship is out of steam. And Twitter could capitalize here and find a way to make itself to both sides. /rant & ramble

Michael Leis's headshot

Nov 24, 2008 at 09:47 AM EST

By Michael Leis

Hey Russ -- You're bringing up a lot of great points. I don't think it was well researched. Wearing the babies doesn't cause pain, and they paint it as a fad, when after a decade of popular use, it's clearly a trend. In terms of the organization, there was none, which is part of what's so fascinating about the weekend's activities. There was no clear ringleader. Did it need one? When you look at any civil conflict, you have two parties: a party in power with only power to lose, and a party pushing change because they have nothing to lose. Twitter offered a lot of people with nothing to lose a chance to affect change and gain exposure: which they did. They achieved their goal of having the ad removed from its official context, and a tremendously large corporation acknowledging their existence. There have been thousands of words written on this episode, and it is sending ripples through marketing and Pharma. That is a big win created by a very small group. And I also agree that this episode should show large corporations the opportunities that abound in social media. There are 10k people out there raising their hands to engage with Motrin. What's the plan J&J?

Adam Kmiec's headshot

Nov 24, 2008 at 09:54 AM EST

By Adam Kmiec

3 Things.... 1. This situation proves the power social media can have (for good or bad) 2. It also proves twitter is still niche, has minimal reach, and limited scale (right now). Motrin sales weren't off and my guess is this didn't make a dent in their projected volume. What will hurt is the margin. They spent X to create the work, are spending Y to pull the work, and will then need to spend Z to create more work. 3. It makes you question (I've been doing it for years) the value in testing ads ahead of time. This is J&J we're talking about. There's just no way that ad went live without it being tested. The testing gave it a green light. The testing results could still be accurate. For 80% of the target I'm sure the ad does exactly what it's supposed to do: make you chuckle and put Motrin at the top of your mind. Right or wrong and whether you like the ad or not, two negative things happened after this situation: 1. Several clients/companies pulled back and/or killed social media projects (2 of mine were put on hold) 2. Mom bloggers once again suffered another black eye. This quote from a recent AdAge article on the Motrin subject says it all "Right or wrong, the rest of the web is now rolling its eyes, again, at our community," Erin Kotecki Vest said on Nov. 17 at QueenofSpainBlog.com." Good stuff.

ABOUT THIS BLOGGER

Michael Leis

Michael Leis (@mleis) is the Senior Associate, Strategy at Trellist Marketing | Technology....

View full profile

Latest posts by Michael:

MOST POPULAR

LATEST BLOG COMMENT

Return to the top.

INDUSTRY JOBSSubscribe to industry jobs

Return to the top.

ads powered by Microsoft Advertising